The Impact on the Internet on Society: An international Perspective

The Impact on the Internet on Society


INTRODUCTION
The web is the decisive engineering of the Information Age, when the power motor was the vector of technical transformation of Industrial Age. This worldwide community of computer networks, largely based nowadays on os’s of wireless correspondence, gives ubiquitous capability of multimodal, active communication in time that is chosen, transcending space. The web isn’t a brand new technology: the ancestor of its, the Arpanet, was for starters deployed in 1969 (Abbate 1999). Though it had been located in the 1990s when it was actually privatized and released from the command of the U.S. Department of Commerce it diffused worldwide at speed that is extraordinary: in 1996 the 1st survey of Internet computer users counted aproximatelly forty million; in 2013 they’re more than 2.5 billion, with China accounting for the biggest amount of Internet users. Moreover, for some time the spread of the Internet was restricted by the trouble to lay out land based telecommunications infrastructure within the appearing nations. This has changed with the surge of wireless communication in the first twenty first century. Indeed, throughout 1991, there have been aproximatelly sixteen million members of wireless devices in the planet, in 2013 they’re close to seven billion (in a world of 7.7 billion man beings). Counting on the family as well as village applications of mobile phones, in addition to taking into account the restricted use of these units among kids under 5 yrs of age, we are able to say that humankind has become almost completely connected, albeit with amazing levels of inequality during the bandwidth and inside the effectiveness and also cost of the service.

At the center of these correspondence networks the Internet guarantees the generation, distribution, then use of digitized info in all platforms. According to the study published by Martin Hilbert in Science (Hilbert and López 2011), 95 percent of all information existing in the planet is digitized and most of it is accessible on the Internet and other computer networks.

The scope and speed of the transformation in our interaction environment by wireless communication and Internet has triggered each sort of dystopian and utopian perceptions around the planet.

As in most moments of big technical change, institutions, companies, and people believe the level of the modification, though they’re frequently overwhelmed by it, from large ignorance of its results.

The media irritate the distorted perception by dwelling into scary stories on the foundation of anecdotal observation and partial commentary. If there’s a subject where social sciences, in the diversity of theirs, must help the total comprehension of the planet where we reside, it’s exactly the spot which has come to be called with academia as Internet Studies. Because, in reality, academic research knows a good offer on the interaction between Society and Internet, on the foundation of methodologically rigorous empirical investigation done in a plurality of institutional and cultural contexts. Any method of significant technical change creates a mythology. In part since it enters practice before researchers are able to evaluate its implications and effects, so there’s surely a gap between societal change as well as its understanding. For example, media usually claim that intensive use of the Internet raises the chance of alienation, depression, isolation, and withdrawal from modern society. In reality, evidence that is available shows that there’s possibly no connection or perhaps an optimistic cumulative connection between Online use and also the intensity of sociability. We observe that, general, the more sociable individuals are, the much more they make use of the Internet. And also the more they make use of the Internet, the much more they improve their sociability online and main street, the civic engagement of theirs, and also the intensity of family and also friendship relationships, in all countries – except for a few of early studies of online in the 1990s, corrected by their writers further along (Castells 2001; Castells et al. 2007; Wellman and Rainie 2012; Center for the Digital Future 2012 et al.).

Therefore, the goal of the chapter is going to be summarizing several of the primary key research findings on the social consequences of online depending on the research offered by several of the main institutions specialized in the interpersonal analysis of the Internet. Much more particularly, I’ll be going with the information from the earth at large: the World Internet Survey done by the Center for the Digital Future, Faculty of Southern California; the accounts of British Computer Society (BCS), utilizing information coming from the World Values Survey on the Faculty of Michigan; the Nielsen accounts for a range of countries; and also the yearly accounts through the International Telecommunications Union. For information along the United States, I’ve used the Pew American Life as well as Internet Project on the Pew Institute. For the United Kingdom, the Oxford Internet Survey on the Oxford Internet Institute, Faculty of Oxford, and the Virtual Society Project coming from the Social and economic Science Research Council. For Spain, the Project Internet Catalonia of Online Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3) on the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC); the different reports over the info society from Telefónica; and also as a result of the Orange Foundation. For Portugal, the Observatório de Sociedade da Informação e do Conhecimento (OSIC) found Lisbon. I’d love to stress that the majority of the information in these stories converge toward the same trends. Therefore I’ve selected for the analysis of mine the results which complement and reinforce one another, providing a regular image of the human experience on the web in spite of the man variety.

Considering the goal of the publication to attain a broad market, I won’t present in this book the information supporting the analysis presented here. Rather, I’m referring the curious person on the internet sources of re-search groups stated earlier, and also to selected bibliographic references talking about the empirical base of the interpersonal trends found here.

TECHNOLOGIES OF FREEDOM, THE NETWORK SOCIETY, AND THE CULTURE OF AUTONOMY
To be able to completely grasp the consequences on the Internet on modern society, we must recall that concept is material culture. It’s manufactured in a cultural practice in a certain institutional surroundings on the foundation of knowledge, interests, values, and the ideas of the producers of theirs, each their early creators and their consequent producers. In this process we should have the owners on the technology, who ideal and adjust the science instead of adopting it, and also by so doing they alter it and produce it in a never-ending practice of interaction between social use and technological production. Thus, to look at the importance of Internet in society we should remember the precise attributes of Internet as a technologies. Then we should put it within the context on the transformation of the general social structure and in connection with the lifestyle attribute of this particular social structure. Certainly, we are living in a brand new social structure, the worldwide community culture, recognized by the rise associated with a new society, the lifestyle of autonomy.

Web is a technology of independence, in the conditions coined by Ithiel de Sola Pool throughout 1973, originating out of a libertarian society, paradoxically funded by the Pentagon because of the profit of researchers, designers, and the students of theirs, with no immediate military program in your mind (Castells 2001). The expansion on the Internet coming from the mid 1990s onward resulted from the combination of 3 primary factors:

The technological breakthrough on the World Wide Web by Tim Berners Lee and the willingness of his to disperse the source code to enhance it by the open source contribution associated with a worldwide community of consumers, within continuity with the openness on the TCP/IP Internet protocols. The net keeps working under similar idea of open source. And two thirds of net servers are operated by Apache, an open source server program.
Institutional change in the control of the Internet, preventing it under the loose managing of the global Internet group, privatizing it, and also allowing both commercial purposes along with cooperative uses.
Major changes in societal structure, tradition, along with cultural behavior: marketing as a common organizational form; individuation as the primary orientation of societal behavior; as well as the lifestyle of autonomy as the lifestyle on the system culture.
I am going to elaborate on these main trends.

Society is a system society; that’s, a culture constructed around organizational and personal networks powered by electronic networks as well as communicated with the Internet. And because networks are worldwide and also understand no boundaries, the system society is a worldwide community society. This historically distinct social structure resulted from interaction in between the emerging technological paradigm according to the electronic revolution and some major sociocultural changes. A major dimension of these modifications is what is marked the rise of the Me centered society, or even, in sociological terminology, the procedure of individuation, the drop of community understood in regards to space, family, work, then ascription in general. This’s not the conclusion of community, and not the end of place-based interaction, but there’s a change toward the reconstruction of interpersonal relationships, which includes strong cultural and personal ties which may be regarded as a kind of community, on the foundation of specific interests, values, and tasks.

The procedure for individuation isn’t simply a question of cultural evolution, it’s materially created by the unique kinds of organizing financial tasks, and political and social life, as I examined in the trilogy of mine on the Information Age (Castells 1996 2003). It’s dependent on the transformation of room (metropolitan life), economic activity and work (rise of networked business plus networked hiking procedures), communication and culture (shift from mass interaction dependent on mass press to mass self communication dependent on the Internet); on the problems of the patriarchal household, with escalating autonomy of its specific members; the substitution of mass media politics for mass bash politics; and also globalization as the picky network of processes and places throughout the earth.

But individuation doesn’t imply isolation, and less the conclusion of community. Sociability is reconstructed as networked individualism as well as community by way of a quest for like minded people in a method which fuses internet interaction with not online interaction, cyberspace and also the regional space. Individuation is definitely the key practice in constituting subjects (collective or individual), social networking is the organizational form built by these topics; this’s the system culture, so the kind of sociability is what Wellman and Rainie (2012) conceptualized as networked individualism. Network technologies are obviously the place because of this latest social structure and this completely new way of life (Papacharissi 2010).

As mentioned above, academic studies have proven the Internet doesn’t separate individuals, neither will it decrease the sociability of theirs; it really boosts sociability, as proven by myself in the studies of mine in Catalonia (Castells 2007), Wellman and Rainie within the United States (2012), Cardoso in Portugal (2010), along with the World Internet Survey of the community in particular (Center for the Digital Future 2012 et al.). Moreover, a key research by Michael Willmott for the British Computer Society (Trajectory Partnership 2010) indicates a good correlation, for people as well as for nations, between the frequency as well as intensity of the usage of online as well as the mental signs of individual happiness. He used international data for 35,000 folks obtained from the World Wide Survey on the Faculty of Michigan through 2005 to 2007. Controlling for some other elements, the analysis demonstrated that Internet use empowers folks by improving the feelings of theirs of influence, personal freedom, and security, all thoughts that have an optimistic impact on personal well-being and happiness. The impact is especially beneficial for individuals with lower income and that are much less qualified, for individuals in the growing world, and also for females. Age doesn’t impact the good relationship; it’s substantial for every age. Why females? Because they’re at the middle of the system of the families of theirs, Internet will help them to manage the lives of theirs. Furthermore, it will help them to get over the isolation of theirs, especially in patriarchal societies. The web also increases the rise of the lifestyle of autonomy.

The key for the procedure of individuation would be the building of autonomy by interpersonal actors, who become topics in the process. They do this by determining their specific tasks in interaction with, however, not submission to, the institutions of modern society. This’s the situation for just a minority of people, but due to their capability to direct and also mobilize they present an innovative society in each and every url of societal life: in job (entrepreneurship), during the press (the energetic audience), within the Internet (the innovative user), within the industry (the proactive and informed consumer), in training (students as educated critical thinkers, which makes possible the brand new frontier of m-learning and e-learning pedagogy), in overall health (the patient centered wellbeing managing system) inside e government (the educated, participatory citizen), within sociable motions (cultural alter on the grassroots, as as part of environmentalism or feminism), what about politics (the independent minded citizen able to get involved in self generated political networks).

There’s growing evidence of the strong connection between the rise and the Internet of social autonomy. From 2002 to 2007 I described in Catalonia among probably the largest studies ever performed in Europe online and culture, dependent on 55,000 interviews, one third of them face to confront (IN3 2002 07). As part of this research, the collaborators of mine and I compared the actions of Internet users to non Internet owners within a sample of 3,000 folks, representative of the public of Catalonia. Because in 2003 just aproximatelly forty % of individuals were Internet users we can actually evaluate the variations in societal conduct for non-users and users, something that today would be difficult given the seventy nine % penetration speed of the Internet in Catalonia. Although the information are fairly old, the results are not, as much more current studies in some other countries (particularly within Portugal) seem to verify the observed trends. We constructed scales of autonomy within dimensions that are different.